![]() ![]() I'm really not for processing C-41 at home. One nice thing about ECN-2 is that the developer formula is public. But upon further research it appears the colorists most major studios use are pros and I'm not sure how they're editing it. I think one of the reasons I wanted to shoot ECN-2 film is if you look at sites like Film Grab, some of those movies shot on vision 3 stocks, have stills that looks incredible. A lab near me will process a roll of C-41 for $6 but proper ECN-2 is like $20 plus shipping. The cost is lower but the proper processing can be a bit more expensive. I uhh, well I guess I'm not sure I really think Vision 3 is superior for stills. I am yet to see a Vision/ECN-2 image scan that would make me want to go through the pain of ECN-2 processing I meant C-41 seems to produce negatives that maybe scan easier? I don't know lmao I asked this on another forum and basically got "Kodak makes still film for stills and movie film for movies", which does make sense I guess. This sounds tempting and cost efficient, so I may try it one day. So anyone can mix their own fresh ECN-2 developer from raw chemicals. ![]() It gets butchered in C41 and requires a lot of post-scanning corrections. Also, according to him, cross-processing color films always leads to color shifts, which is confirmed by my personal painful experience scanning Cinestill developed in C41.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |